More about Wednesday night...
I promised a blog about Wednesday night's gathering, where we watched Session One of "The Present Future", led by Reggie McNeal. Though we didn't have as much time to discuss the DVD due to time constraints, I think we all felt that Reggie's analysis of the generational divides was pretty much spot-on. Though it's clear that the "dividing lines" are not exact(we all know people who may be categorized in one way, but clearly think/live another way), it was, generally speaking, pretty accurate. And I think we all could visualize people who really fit the mold of the generations that Reggie was dissecting.
Here are some general thoughts I had on the session, some new and some that we discussed on Wednesday night.
-It is clear that most of our churches, at least those of which I've been a part, are dominated in leadership by Builders/Boomers. And there has been a slow, steady transition of leadership from Builders to Boomers over the past decade or two, as a trust level has been built there. In other words, I think the Builders started to sense that Boomers weren't gonna turn everything in the church on its head, and would try to maintain what Builders had set into place, while improving on it by adding programs/elements.
The problem, in my opinion, is that now, it is becoming more and more clear that another shift in strategy/leadership has to occur, but the BB's(builders/boomers) are nowhere CLOSE to bringing X'ers on board to lead the church into the new millennium. X'ers realize that the church MUST shift in its structure, vision, and methods to reach a changing culture. But there is just not that trust level from BB's to X'ers. That's one reason that so many X'ers are seeking new ways to "be the church"....because it doesn't appear that institutional churches will be changing anytime soon.
As Reggie stated, for BB's, changing methods and structures would almost be like an admission of failure. X'ers, in general, are more comfortable with change, and will make adjustments if things aren't going well. Stubbornness is not as prevalent in newer generations. It's not failure to admit that older structures aren't efficient for reaching newer generations. In fact, it shows wisdom, and it shows that a church cares more for the unchurched than it cares for maintaining programs/structures that only cater to the flock.
Again, these are generalizations, but I think in the big picture, they prove to be true.
-Every generation has to be careful not to dismiss another. I'm an X-er, through and through, and there have been times when I've banged my head against a wall wondering why previous generations just don't "get it", or why they try to dismiss the ideas of X'ers. I realize now that it's just a major difference in worldviews. BB's can't wrap their minds around some of the new ways of thinking, just like X-ers can't always wrap their minds around older structures.
But that can lead to a dismissal of values, and that's bad, too. For example, those whose "heart worship"(as Reggie called it) is strictly contemporary stuff might not only prefer newer worship music, they may dismiss hymns altogether as having no value. But hymns have been a powerful outlet of ministry and worship for hundreds of years, and they are the "heart worship" for millions of people. Dismissing hymns as having no value would be just as wrong as dismissing contemporary music as having no value.
I think what X'ers(and milennials) are realizing is that "the church" as I've categorized it, can no longer think that it can reach everyone in its current state. Newer generations just will not invest in church that doesn't connect with them in a real way, and they're having trouble finding churches that do. Meanwhile, established churches are still trying to be all things to all people by adding programs/events/structures, not realizing(or not admitting) that newer generations actually prefer(by and large) a SIMPLER church, scaled back, stripped down, focused on "being" church and not "doing" church.
Still, my temptation is to dismiss established churches with older structures...but they obviously serve a place in the kingdom, and they're obviously reaching people, and meeting people's needs. It's just not my thing anymore. But to say that they're no longer valuable would be like saying that God can't use them anymore to reach people, and that's wrong.
So while we face resistance to what God has called us to do, even from fellow Christians, let's remember that they're coming from a completely different frame of reference. The world is changing, and we need to change along with it. Not the message, of course, but the methods and the mediums.
Enough for now. Discuss.
